Categories: Crypto

TradFi Deleveraging Triggered Feb 5 Crypto Crash



Bitwise advisor Jeff Park attributed the February 5 crypto selloff to multi-asset portfolio deleveraging rather than crypto-specific factors.

Summary

  • February 5 selling was driven by multi-asset fund deleveraging, not crypto-native fear.
  • CME basis trades unwound violently as pod shops de-grossed across portfolios.
  • Short gamma and structured product hedging amplified downside despite ETF inflows.

IBIT recorded 10 billion in trading volume, doubling its previous high, while options activity hit historic levels led by put contracts rather than calls.

The crash saw Bitcoin (BTC) fall 13.2% yet IBIT posted $230 million in net creations with 6 million new shares, bringing total ETF inflows above $300 million.

Goldman Sachs’ prime brokerage desk reported February 4 was one of the worst daily performances for multi-strategy funds with a z-score of 3.5. This was a 0.05% probability event 10 times rarer than a three-sigma occurrence.

Park wrote that risk managers at pod shops forced indiscriminate de-grossing, explaining why February 5 turned into a bloodbath.

CME basis trade unwinding drove violent deleveraging

Park identified the CME basis trade as a primary driver of selling pressure. The near-dated basis jumped from 3.3% on February 5 to 9% on February 6, one of the largest moves observed since ETF launch.

Multi-strategy funds like Millennium and Citadel hold large positions in the Bitcoin ETF complex and were forced to unwind basis trades by selling spot while buying futures.

IBIT showed tight correlation with software equities rather than gold over recent weeks. Gold is not typically held by multi-strategy funds as part of funding trades, confirming that drama centered on these funds rather than retail investment advisors.

The catalyst originated from software equity selloffs rather than crypto-native selling.

Structured products created crypto bloodbath

Structured products with knock-in barrier features contributed to selling acceleration. A JPMorgan note priced in November carried a barrier at $43,600.

Notes priced in December when Bitcoin dropped 10% would have barriers in the $38,000-$39,000 range.

Put buying behavior in crypto-native markets over preceding weeks meant crypto dealers held naturally short gamma positions.

Options were sold too cheaply relative to outsized moves that eventually materialized, worsening the downside. Dealers held short gamma on puts from the $64,000-$71,000 range.

February 6 recovery saw CME open interest expand faster than Binance. The basis trade partially recovered, offsetting outflow effects while Binance open interest collapsed.

Park concluded that tradfi derisking was the catalyst that pushed Bitcoin to levels where short gamma hedging ramped up declines through non-directional activity requiring additional inventory.



Source link

Adam Forsyth

Share
Published by
Adam Forsyth

Recent Posts

Origami Becomes a Go-To Instant Game Provider for Online Casinos

Instant games now shape how many players experience online casinos. Sessions are short, interactions are…

1 minute ago

Ripple Advances ZK Proofs on XRPL to Unlock Privacy

All news is rigorously fact-checked and reviewed by leading blockchain experts and seasoned industry insiders.…

3 minutes ago

Microsoft Starts Testing Built-In Sysmon Monitoring in Windows 11

Microsoft is rolling out native Sysmon support in Windows 11 Insider builds, giving security teams…

9 minutes ago

BSP to Financial Firms: Do Not Transact With Unregistered Crypto Exchanges

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. BitPinas…

12 minutes ago

UBS Says ‘Crypto Is Not an Asset’ as Bitcoin Whales and ETFs Pull Back

UBS has taken a firm stance against digital assets, declaring that “crypto is not an…

19 minutes ago

How Solana Overtook Ethereum’s Early Growth Curve

While Ethereum laid down the groundwork for smart contracts,21Shares found that Solana's speed and…

1 hour ago