Senate panel considers CLARITY Act as banking groups propose stablecoin yield changes

The Senate Banking Committee is preparing to mark up the CLARITY Act on May 14, 2026, and the banking lobby would very much like a word before that happens.

A coalition of major financial trade groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, and the Independent Community Bankers of America, sent a joint letter on May 8 demanding consumer protection enhancements and wording tweaks to a recently struck stablecoin yield compromise. The timing is not subtle. Chairman Tim Scott wants the bill wrapped up before the May 21 Memorial Day recess, which leaves roughly a week to hash out changes that the banking industry considers non-negotiable.

The stablecoin yield deal, explained

The compromise, brokered on May 1 by Senators Thom Tillis and Lisa Alsobrooks, tries to split the difference. It bans passive interest yields on stablecoins, meaning issuers can’t simply pay holders a percentage just for holding tokens, the way a savings account works. But it does permit rewards tied to transaction volume or platform activity.

The banking groups apparently don’t think this distinction is drawn sharply enough. Their May 8 letter calls for additional consumer protections and more precise language, presumably to ensure the “activity-based rewards” loophole doesn’t become a backdoor for the kind of yield products that would compete directly with bank deposits.

What’s actually in the CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act passed the House in July 2025 with a bipartisan vote of 294-134. At its core, the legislation draws jurisdictional lines between the SEC and CFTC for digital assets.

The Senate version expands the bill to nine titles, covering not just the SEC-CFTC split but also DeFi regulation, banking activities related to digital assets, illicit finance provisions, bankruptcy protections, and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.

The White House has set a target of July 4, 2026, for a presidential signature, according to the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets. That timeline requires the Senate to reconcile its version with the House bill and get a final vote.

What this means for investors

The stablecoin yield provision is the piece that most directly affects everyday crypto users. If the banking lobby succeeds in tightening the language around activity-based rewards, it could limit the types of incentive programs that stablecoin platforms offer. For DeFi users accustomed to earning yield on stablecoin deposits, the ban on passive yields, if it survives in its current form, represents a meaningful shift.

Watch the May 14 markup closely. If the banking groups’ revisions get incorporated, the stablecoin provisions could look meaningfully different by the time the bill reaches the Senate floor. If Scott holds the line and pushes through without major changes, the banking lobby will likely shift its fight to the conference committee, where House and Senate versions get reconciled. Either way, the July 4 deadline is looking tight.